The main concern of Tobacco Control is always to supply a forum for research, analysis, commentary, and debate on policies, programmes, and methods which can be prone to further the objectives of a comprehensive tobacco control policy. The introduction should indicate why the research reported or issues discussed are important in terms of controlling tobacco use, and the discussion section should include an analysis of how the research reported contributes to tobacco control objectives in papers submitted for review.
Papers firmly anchored to a policy that is strategic programme context are more inclined to be accepted for publication. Whilst the log seeks to achieve a readership that is international writers must look into whether their intended submissions target problems or themes, that are apt to be of great interest to scientists employed in other countries. Extremely parochial dilemmas, that have few classes for tobacco control policy outside a paper’s local context, are unlikely to get high concern. The manuscripts editors will generally speaking maybe maybe not offer high priority to:
- Studies of cigarette smoking prevalence and its own correlates. They are most readily useful ideal to nationwide journals. Few individuals residing outside nation have an interest in whether that nation has 30% or 35% of cigarette cigarette smokers.
- Knowledge, attitudes, behaviour (KAB) studies of specific populace teams or medical researchers. Once again, they are better suited to national journals or even wellness speciality that is professional. Few individuals in other nations are usually enthusiastic about (for instance) whether nurses in a hospital that is regional enthusiastic about helping patients quit. Nationwide studies, and people using such studies into initial areas are of more interest.
- Reports that evoke unanimous “so what?” responses from the editors. They are documents with findings that appear to hold no apparent value for changing policy or training in tobacco control. Continue Reading